Securities Lawyer 101 l Brenda Hamilton

Securities Lawyer 101 l Brenda Hamilton

Thursday, April 10, 2014

The Securities Act of 1933

The Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) is often referred to as the “truth in securities” law. The 1933 Act requires disclosure of financial and other material information about securities that are being offered for sale to the public. The Act also prohibits deceit, misrepresentation, and other types of fraud in connection with the offer and sale of securities.

All securities sold in the U.S. must be registered with the SEC or be exempt from registration. The disclosures required by the 1933 Act are most often provided in a
registration statement. The disclosures
required in a registration statement under the Securities Act allow investors to make informed decisions about whether to purchase a security.

Not all offerings of securities must be registered with the Commission. Some exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act include:

♦ private offerings to a limited number of persons or institutions;

♦ offerings of limited size;

♦ intrastate offerings; and

♦ securities of municipal, state, and federal governments.

Registration Statement Disclosures

The disclosures required in registration statements filed under the 1933 Act include:

♦ a description of the company’s properties and business;

♦ a description of the security to be offered for sale;

♦ information about the management of the company; and

♦ financial statements certified by independent accountants.

Registration statements and prospectuses become available to the public almost immediately upon filing with the SEC on the SEC’s EDGAR database. Upon filing, the SEC will often review registration statements and, if appropriate, render comments to ensure compliance with disclosure requirements.

Securities Act Liability

The 1933 Act provides the primary legal authority for civil remedies for the purchasers of securities. In order to have a viable claim, the test for liability under Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act require the purchaser to prove a material misstatement or omission of a material fact. Section 11 liability arises from the requirements for filing a registration statement. Section 12 liability arises from the requirement to distribute prospectuses.

The determination of whether a registration statement is materially misleading is whether defendants’ representations, taken together and in context, would have misled a reasonable investor about the nature of the investment.

Securities Act Section 11

Section 11 of the Securities Act  is designed to ensure “compliance with the disclosure provisions of the Securities Act by imposing a stringent standard of liability on the parties who play a direct role in a registered offering.”

If there is a material misstatement or omission in a registration statement under the Securities Act, the following may have liability:

♦ the issuer;

♦ every person who signed the registration statement;

♦ every person who is a director or partner in the issuer;

♦ every person who is named (with their consent) as a director or “future” director;

♦ every accountant, engineer, appraiser, or other “expert” whose profession gives authority to his statement, who is named as having prepared or certified any part of the registration statement; and

♦ every underwriter of the security.

Securities Act Section 12

Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act allows a purchaser of a security to bring a private action against a seller who offers or sells a security “by means of a prospectus or oral communication, which includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements… not misleading.”

Section 12 provides a remedy of rescission, unless the investor no longer owns the security. If the investor no longer owns the security, Section 12 allows him to recover the consideration paid for a security with interest less the amount of any income received.

Section 12 imposes liability without requiring proof of either fraud or reliance. As such, liability may exist whether or not an investor actually relied on the misstatement.

The full text of the Securities Act can be found at: http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sa33.pdf.

For further information about this securities law blog post, please contact Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney at 101 Plaza Real S, Suite 202 N, Boca Raton Florida, (561) 416-8956, by email at info@securitieslawyer101.com or visit www.gopublic101.com.   This securities law blog post is provided as a general informational service to clients and friends of Hamilton & Associates Law Group and should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal and compliance advice on any specific matter, nor does this message create an attorney-client relationship. For more information about going public and the rules and regulations affecting the use of Rule 144, Form 8K, crowdfunding, FINRA Rule 6490Rule 506 private placement offerings and memorandums, Regulation A, Rule 504 offerings, SEC reporting requirements, SEC registration statements on Form S-1 IPO’s, OTC Pink Sheet listings, Form 10 OTCBB and OTC Markets disclosure requirements, DTC Chills, Global Locks, reverse mergers, public shells, direct public offerings and direct public offerings please contact Hamilton and Associates at (561) 416-8956 or info@securitieslawyer101.com. Please note that the prior results discussed herein do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Hamilton & Associates | Securities Lawyers
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney
101 Plaza Real South, Suite 202 North
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephone: (561) 416-8956
Facsimile: (561) 416-2855
www.GoPublic101.com

No comments:

Post a Comment